This blog is about fairness; about looking at objects from multiple perspectives. Stable transformation comes only slowly; and only if the environment is free of sporadic jitters of passion and anger that destabilize growth. I strongly believe that the path to peace crosses through the battle with self.
Saturday, September 29, 2007
US, NATO and Israel Deploy Nukes directed against Iran
Even the most ardent neo-imperialist has no desire to subjugate the Irianian nation, let alone to compromise its independence. Indeed, it would be a deplorable crime against humanity to even contemplate such an abhorrent act. Iran is rightfully proud not only of its history, but also deserves a prominent seat at the table of major world powers. This is not in dispute.
Furthermore, every sovereign nation has the right to secure sources of energy, and even use force of arms when the same is under threat. Again, this is not in question.
But Iran is not seeking nuclear energy. They are seeking nuclear weapons. The only toadie here is Mohammed ElBaradei. The mullah regime would not be so stupid as to launch such weapons at first blush, but the very fact of having them will destroy stability in the entire Middle East, where, as we know, tempers are flammable in the extreme. Can you imagine a scenario with not only Iran and Israel possessing such hellfire, but also Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Jordan and who knows who else?
To that end, and to my great dismay, if the mullah regime does not climb down from their atomic tree, EVERY MEANS is justified to stop them from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Given the choice between the destruction of the world and the destruction of one country, basic logic dictates that that country would, sadly, have to be sacrificed.
Pity that the country in question is Glorious Iran.
Iranians: rise up and overthrow the real overlords - your odious goverment!
The mullah regime would not be so stupid as to launch such weapons at first blush, but the very fact of having them will destroy stability in the entire Middle East, where, as we know, tempers are flammable in the extreme.
Au contraire,
I think if Iran HAD nuclear weapons, or had acquired them, the region would have become more stable and far less inflamable.
I understand your concerns and worries and I am happy that you are not one of those Israelis who come up with the "Iran wants to destroy Israel" nonsense.
But frankly, this is cold war all over again. Iran is not after nuclear weapons, but can you explain the differential treatment that a real dictatorship with a contry full of al-quaeda dn full of extremists like Pakistan is receiving, compared to Iran?
Anyways, i am happy yyou dropped by. Last time I saw you you were heading to Israel.
Skye, take a copy of "The Treacherous Alliance"
Again, Iran doesn't want nuclear weapons, but it will never ever succumb to neoconservatives (of French or American type) economic pressure, because they want a bigger chunk of the pie for lesser price.
Come on, if you are looking for destabilizers, give a beating to Saudis. Their money has been far more dangerous that mullah's rhetoris, no?
4 comments:
Even the most ardent neo-imperialist has no desire to subjugate the Irianian nation, let alone to compromise its independence. Indeed, it would be a deplorable crime against humanity to even contemplate such an abhorrent act. Iran is rightfully proud not only of its history, but also deserves a prominent seat at the table of major world powers. This is not in dispute.
Furthermore, every sovereign nation has the right to secure sources of energy, and even use force of arms when the same is under threat. Again, this is not in question.
But Iran is not seeking nuclear energy. They are seeking nuclear weapons. The only toadie here is Mohammed ElBaradei. The mullah regime would not be so stupid as to launch such weapons at first blush, but the very fact of having them will destroy stability in the entire Middle East, where, as we know, tempers are flammable in the extreme. Can you imagine a scenario with not only Iran and Israel possessing such hellfire, but also Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Jordan and who knows who else?
To that end, and to my great dismay, if the mullah regime does not climb down from their atomic tree, EVERY MEANS is justified to stop them from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Given the choice between the destruction of the world and the destruction of one country, basic logic dictates that that country would, sadly, have to be sacrificed.
Pity that the country in question is Glorious Iran.
Iranians: rise up and overthrow the real overlords - your odious goverment!
The mullah regime would not be so stupid as to launch such weapons at first blush, but the very fact of having them will destroy stability in the entire Middle East, where, as we know, tempers are flammable in the extreme.
Au contraire,
I think if Iran HAD nuclear weapons, or had acquired them, the region would have become more stable and far less inflamable.
I understand your concerns and worries and I am happy that you are not one of those Israelis who come up with the "Iran wants to destroy Israel" nonsense.
But frankly, this is cold war all over again. Iran is not after nuclear weapons, but can you explain the differential treatment that a real dictatorship with a contry full of al-quaeda dn full of extremists like Pakistan is receiving, compared to Iran?
Anyways, i am happy yyou dropped by. Last time I saw you you were heading to Israel.
Skye, take a copy of "The Treacherous Alliance"
Again, Iran doesn't want nuclear weapons, but it will never ever succumb to neoconservatives (of French or American type) economic pressure, because they want a bigger chunk of the pie for lesser price.
Come on, if you are looking for destabilizers, give a beating to Saudis. Their money has been far more dangerous that mullah's rhetoris, no?
By the way:
"Every MEANs is justified to stop them"
Do you consider yourself a human?! or one of the chosen people?!
Hard to believe that we again approach Midnight, Naj.
My feeling is that humans will destroy themselves and our world. They are too stupid, too primitive to do otherwise.
That's sad for those of us who see the problems and are sounding the warning bells. It has ever been thus!
Post a Comment